In the bleak dawn of April 2025, NIST, considered by some the GRC voice of reason and by others bureaucratic dream-weavers, has just unfurled its updated Privacy Framework 1.1.
Historically, privacy and cybersecurity operated in parallel realms: one governed by legal mandates, the other by technical safeguards. But as AI blurs boundaries, these domains are converging.
Oh, but don’t worry. The update aligns with their Cybersecurity Framework, providing a cohesive approach to risk management. Meanwhile, your smart fridge is negotiating with your Nest thermostat about when to sell your sleeping patterns to a hedge fund.
But let’s talk turkey. This isn’t about privacy. It’s about containment. Artificial Intelligence, the new golden calf, has already smashed through every barrier we thought mattered: scraping data, interpreting it, weaponizing it, and then selling it back to you through a predictive lens wrapped in “personalization.” NIST’s update? It’s not a fix. It’s the instruction manual for building a seatbelt on a rocket after you’ve launched it.
Version 1.1 tries to play marriage counselor between privacy and cybersecurity, two disciplines that have been on a will-they-won’t-they spiral since the early aughts. But now, with AI, there’s no more room for theoretical detachment. This isn’t a simulation. It’s a feedback loop of surveillance, inference, and silent profiling that even Orwell would call “a bit much.”
But let’s talk turkey. This isn’t about privacy. It’s about containment. Artificial Intelligence, the new golden calf, has already smashed through every barrier we thought mattered: scraping data, interpreting it, weaponizing it, and then selling it back to you through a predictive lens wrapped in “personalization.”
This isn’t a policy update. It’s a paper shield against a nuclear warhead made of your medical records, your Tinder swipes, and that thing you said in front of your Alexa last week when you thought it wasn’t listening. (It was.)
NIST is trying to give industry a framework-shaped fire blanket so they can say, “We’re doing something.” Because let’s face it: regulatory theater is still cheaper than actual change.
But there’s a bitter poetry to it. In the midst of hyper-surveillance capitalism, deepfakes, algorithmic injustice, and neural net psychosis, someone still thinks a PDF with “Governance Functions” is going to save your digital ass. Maybe that’s worth something. Maybe not.
The only privacy framework that matters now is: